Barbie. Everybody seems to despise her, with her
unproportional body and seemingly flawless life. Growing up in the 2000s,
Barbie was my life. I would play with her every day and act out scenes with my
friends. Looking at her now, I can understand why she would be picked on as a
“weapon” (Prager 354) against females. However, when I was younger, I never
felt inferior to Barbie with her "giant breasts and high-heeled feet" (354). I would admire her, yes, but only because she was so
successful and could do whatever she wanted to. Barbie has had over 150 jobs
in the last 50 years. She ran for president in the 90s and even became an
astronaut 4 years before Neil Armstrong landed on the moon. If anything, Barbie
should be considered a role model for young girls! She has shown girls that
they can be anything they want to be, and that gender doesn’t matter. I feel
like Barbie can have a positive influence on young children, who are too young
to feel insecure about their bodies anyway. Everybody has heard Barbie’s “I Can
Be Anything I Want to Be” slogan, so is it so wrong that she is promoting the
idea that little girls can do anything they set their mind to? Barbie has
created many opportunities for children to explore what they would love to do
in the future, and I think that that is admirable of her.
Sunday, October 26, 2014
Sunday, October 19, 2014
WWJD- What Was Jefferson Doing?
In our seminar this week, there was a lot of dispute about
Jefferson’s document, Stanton’s argument, and Douglass’s speech. I don’t
believe that there is any one document that is the most correct and should be
the most respected. But since the Declaration of Independence got the most
hate, I will do my best to defend it. First of all, Jefferson’s main purpose in
creating the Declaration of Independence is to help the United States get out
of the tyrannical rule of the kind in Great Britain, not to make all American
citizens have all equal rights in regards to skin color or gender. He does say "that all men are created equal, and that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness", but this means
that no one person should have unlimited power over a body of people, such as
the king. In a way, he did help everybody become equal by getting rid of the tyrant.
I guess Stanton and Douglass thought that this would resolve all inequality
everywhere. They have to understand, though, that this document is because the
United States should be “Free and Independent States…Absolved from all
Allegiance to the British Crown”. That is the purpose of this document. Stanton
says that “He has compelled her to submit to laws, in the formation of which
she has no voice”, but that can change. If the Declaration of Independence had
not been created, women would have fewer rights in this tyranny, and a more
difficult chance to change the government, as the government was ruled
overseas. Furthermore, Douglass should not be degrading the Fourth of July. He
said so himself that “The signers of the Declaration of Independence were brave
men”, and that event was a very huge turning point in American history. Yes,
this does seem unfair for slaves, as they are still not quite free, but they
are one step closer to getting their rights with a more fair democratic
government. So don’t hate on Jefferson, because he made everybody’s lives much
easier by helping us separate from Great Britain.
Saturday, October 11, 2014
The End?
I
don't know if it's just me, but I feel like the ending to The
Scarlet Letter is unfair. It
doesn't seem right that Dimmesdale just dies because he finally told everybody
the truth. Meanwhile, Hester and Pearl have been living with public ignominy
for over seven years. Pearl has to grow up without a father figure in her life
now. Plus, she and her mother have to endure the disgust and disappointment
brought on by the townspeople who think that it is their faults that they have
"corrupted" Dimmesdale and caused him to die. This makes
Hester and Pearl seem much stronger than Dimmesdale. They are tough, like the
thorns of a rosebush, whereas Dimmesdale is the delicate petal. For the
majority of the story, Dimmesdale is always associated with his “bodily
weakness” and “faintness of heart” (Hawthorne 250), as he is basically “destroyed”
(155) by this whole “A” situation. Hester, on the other hand, has “strength”
and “power” (158). It’s a bit ironic because it’s usually the male who is
portrayed as being the tough guy who can handle everything. This kind of
reminds me of Katniss and Peeta from The Hunger Games, because Katniss
is the strong, quick archer, and Peeta is known as a baker’s son who can lift
bags of flour. Just like in The Scarlet Letter, the male, Peeta, is
wounded along their journey and the female, Katniss restores his spirit and
passion to fight through everything.

Sunday, October 5, 2014
Women, Men, and WoMEN
Deborah Tannen’s essay “There Is No Unmarked Woman” shows
that women are often treated differently than men. Women are constantly marked
by their appearances, choices, and actions whereas men are all uniform. People
can label women as being “sensible”, “stylish”, “sexy”, etc. However, all men
are just categorized as “male” (Tannen 389). Tannen proves that women are deemed lesser than men because they are labeled based upon the male’s status. They
usually take their husband’s name and are “more identified by [their] husband’s
identity” (391). Then, Tannen shows that, in nature, it is the female
population that dominates the males. Professor Ralph Fasold notes that it is the
male who is marked nature, as males often rely on a queen bee to carry out
their duties. He mentions that there are even species that only produce females, like the whiptail lizard, and none that produce only males. I don’t think that people should look too
deeply into these sciences. In the end, everybody must rely on each other,
regardless of gender. At a recent United Nations conference, Emma Watson
launches her HeForShe Campaign. It revolves around gender equality. Being a
feminist, Watson claims that feminism isn’t supposed to bring men down so that
women can rise in power, but “the belief that men and women should have equal
rights and opportunities”. There isn’t
any one gender that is dominant over the other; everybody needs to work
together equally so that our world can flourish.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)